Another way they created space in the wing was with the winger making a run inside and taking the opponent full-back with him.

Metz played a 4-4-1-1 with Farid Boulaya linking up the midfield and the striker. Complete table of Ligue 1 standings for the 2020/2021 Season, plus access to tables from past seasons and other Football leagues. Throughout the whole game, Marseille pressed higher and more intensely than Metz. Moreover, since Payet has gone up and he is the left-winger, this has left the opponent right-back open.

Additionally, Marseille performed an intense counter-press to be able to regain the ball as quickly as possible in a high position.

There were occasions where the right-back went inside and brought the opponent left-winger with him. Saison 2019-2020 Affluences de la saison par journée 2020-2021 2019-2020 2018-2019 … It is important to highlight the great game that Farid Boulaya played as he connected the midfield and the striker. In this analysis, we will see how Marseille, which is the superior team, planned their game against Metz, who aimed to be the surprise of the day. This is a very high number and shows that they allowed Marseille to play with plenty of time on the ball. PPDA is passes per defensive action so the lower the number, the more intense and effective your team’s pressure is. Additionally, it also made the opponent left-winger drop back to stay in line with the Marseille right-back and thus gave more space to the right centre-back. This change in their pressure reduced their PPDA in the second half to 17.2 which is a substantial difference from before. Saison. In the second half, Metz’s coach Vincent Hognon ordered them to press higher up and with more intensity. The match between these teams ended 1-1, with Metz going ahead first.

In the middle were Boubacar Kamara, as a defensive midfielder, with Morgan Sanson and Valentin Rongier in front of him. For example, in the image below, the player in possession could only cross the ball with the striker not even being in the box. This allowed for him to move forwards and also to be an easy passing option for the centre-back. Metz relied on quick attacks to create danger. He was taking people on (11 dribbles and a 55% success rate) and consistently moving into the right spaces.

As mentioned before, they had a PPDA of 26.5 in the first half. This is seen in the example below, where there are five Marseille players forming a circle around the player in possession to force him to make an error.

However, Marseille were the better team in the game but could not convert their superiority into goals. However, there is a risk to this as if the left-winger goes up, the left centre-midfielder has to mark the Marseille centre-midfielder and the right-back. The striker and the attacking-midfielder had to keep switching between pressuring a centre-back or the defensive midfielder that came down to help. However, there was little pressure on the centre-backs when they got close to their line of pressure and this enabled them to freely move the ball until they found a good option. That is why Boulaya is running into the wing to give him a better attacking passing option. Now their possession percentage increased to 46% and this allowed them to link up better.

La Liga 2019/20: Barcelona vs Atletico Madrid – tactical analysis, Premier League 2019/20: Tottenham vs Everton – tactical analysis, 2. Metz improved in the second half as they pressed more too and so had more possession which allowed them to create more attacks. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Country: England ## England France ; Worldwide; Europe ... first start in 15 months with a goal and two assists as Marseille beat Brest 3-2 on Sunday in their opening game of the Ligue 1 season.... more » 30.08.2020 23:17. Their high press can be seen in the image below. Furthermore, the Metz team did not want to leave themselves vulnerable in case they lost the ball. Having now achieved eight points in five games, they need to step their game up if they want to compete well in the UEFA Champions League. This was especially effective because the player getting the ball would be Thauvin who has the quality to create danger and make a good pass behind the defence. The times Metz would attack, they would also have attacking full-backs, especially on the left side. Up front was Ibrahima Niane and to his sides were Opa Nguette and Habib Maïga. This left the space in the wing for the left-back to run into and create danger. He played as attacking midfielder but had the freedom to go wherever he wanted. They would communicate with each other to see who should go inside. Ligue 1 2020/21: Marseille vs Metz – tactical analysis. Marseille managed to draw in the last minute and deservedly so, as they were the better team throughout the game. In this tactical analysis, we will observe the tactics used by both teams and how these changed over the game. Bundesliga relegation playoffs can be a blessing in disguise for the team from the second tier, over two […], All Content © 2020 Total Football Analysis Magazine. However, they lowered this number in the second half, which we will discuss now. The example below shows how they recover the ball in the midfield in the first image and after three quick passes, the ball is passed to the striker who makes a great run in behind. Also, they were pressing high and counter-pressing intensely in order to get the ball as quickly as possible and start another attack. Marseille came into this game off the back of a bad run, having taken just one point from their previous two games. Through this counter-pressing, Marseille made sure that Metz had problems in creating plays. It has to be said though, that the games they had were mainly against contenders to end up in the first places of Ligue 1. Marseille pressed high to recover the ball as soon as possible and start another attack. In fact, their goal came from a cross into the box by their left-back. On the other hand, Metz had won their previous game but had lost their first three games.